All Forum Posts by: Bryan Johnson

Hi Brian,

Thanks for the response. That is very helpful. Your points are spot on and exactly what I was looking for in regards to figuring out how to think about the deal structure. I imagine this is something you allocate initially (per your comments) versus a variable figure that is quite arbitrary throughout the investment period. This partnership is still "in the works" and we have yet to purchase anything, but I think these are the kinds of things that need to be ironed out before getting too far down the line with any potential investment.

Hi Andrew,

Thanks for the response. I know him fairly well, but I'm not sure I am fully comfortable with this concept. I'm really trying to gauge if this is a standard practice or not.

Here's an example (from how I understand it would operate):

$80K purchase price ($40K from each partner). If there were $20K done in "contracting manhours" and $10K used towards capex, my understanding is that his ownership stake would then be worth $60K/$100K (60%) while mine would be $40K/$100K (40%). The $10K towards capex would be split evenly between the two of us.

I believe there are still some items that need to be hammered out, but does this sound like a poor arrangement (it seems like it is off a bit to me). Wouldn't it make more sense to add an equity kicker in upfront, say 55%/45% given the extra incremental work that he would put into the property?

Hi All,

I've been reading for quite some time, but finally decided to make an account given my current situation.

I have been presented with a partnership opportunity for a real estate investment. For a bit of background on myself, I currently work in finance and have little experience within RE. I have some limited exposure to the industry, but am currently looking to get involved in the form of a passive limited partner. The person I would be working with currently works in the space and owns a number of units. He currently does a lot of contractor work and spends most of his time with his original portfolio.

In regards to structure, the initial equity contribution would match with the purchase price of the property. The one thing I am getting hung up on is that he is proposing to alter the equity mix by including his own contractor work into the value of the property. As an investor, I respect that he will spend more time rehabbing and renovating the property, but I don't know if I understand the concept of adding that work to the total value of the property. I feel like that is something that would be hard to track and a very arbitrary calculation that could significantly dilute my equity ownership in the property. I'm sure many people on the forum have run into similar situations, is this a standard clause or am I potentially getting hosed here.

The property does need some work and that is a key factor (it is being purchased at a significant discount and is not producing income) and the fact that my partner is a contractor already is a huge benefit (renovations done nearly at cost). As a result, I could understand throwing a higher portion of equity in that direction assuming we invested the same amount, but I'm not sure what the protocol is here. Should I be pushing for a 50/50 structure? I'd love to hear any and all advice, thanks in advance for the help!

Bryan