Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

11
Posts
4
Votes
Ryan Montbleau
  • New to Real Estate
  • Boston, MA
4
Votes |
11
Posts

Out-of-State vs. In-State

Ryan Montbleau
  • New to Real Estate
  • Boston, MA
Posted

I am looking to invest in my first rental property. For a first time investor, is it better to purchase a home out-of-state with more cash flow or a property in closer proximity with less cash flow?


More specifically, is there a greater risk in being distant from a first-time investment property? (Assuming a property manager is hired) 

  • Ryan Montbleau
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    4,494
    Posts
    6,465
    Votes
    Marcus Auerbach
    • Investor and Real Estate Agent
    • Milwaukee - Mequon, WI
    6,465
    Votes |
    4,494
    Posts
    Marcus Auerbach
    • Investor and Real Estate Agent
    • Milwaukee - Mequon, WI
    Replied

    Investing out of State is definitely not easy, not long ago (think Blackberry) it was next to impossible for anything less than large multifamily. But it still comes with challenges, higher cost and management inefficiencies. You rely on other people for literally everything, fully trust their judgement and have to pay them for it. And often times you have to rely on people who you can't meet in person before you hire them. One fundamental truth is that nobody watches your money like you do.

    Investing in your backyard comes with many advantages. You recognize issues and opportunities only a local would be able to identify, you can swing by on your way home to chat with the contractor or keep an eye on a new tenant. And when something needs fixing and it's not clear who and how, you can take a look yourself.

    So when you compare the two options you have to decide if the favorable economics are worth the cost and inefficiencies that come with a remote operation. I live and invest in Milwaukee and I (my team) works with a lot of OOS clients and one key factor that stands out to me is the economic delta, the difference between where you make money and where you invest. 

    For Chicago investors Milwaukee seems slightly more attractive (and it is) but the economic delta is not big enough to compensate for the cost and inefficiencies that come with a remote operation; it may be only two hours, but it's still OOS. One requirement we have to work with OOS clients is that they have to come to Milwaukee at least one time before we engage. We want to make sure we are on the same page when it comes to understanding different neighborhood qualities and building conditions. And that requires first hand experience in the field. After that a lot of things can be done on zoom.

    business profile image
    On Point Realty Group - Keller Williams
    5.0 stars
    51 Reviews

    Loading replies...