Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

6
Posts
4
Votes
Tim Wolak
4
Votes |
6
Posts

North Carolina LTR Market

Tim Wolak
Posted

I am new to the real estate investing space but am looking for a long-term rental property in the North Carolina or even South Carolina area. The only issue is that when I use some of those rules I've been reading about (i.e. 1% rule) none of the properties even come close to passing the sniff test. I am aware that these rules are just for quickly sorting through deals on the surface but I still cannot seem to find anything that on the surface would even come close to producing positive cash flow.

For example many houses in the Charlotte area (I know this market is extremely hot) are selling in the 500k range but are only renting out for ~2-2.5k. It doesn't seem like a single one of these houses would be cash flow positive.


Am I thinking about this math correctly (again I'm very new to this type of analysis) or is it just extremely hard to find properties that are producing positive cash flows?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

297
Posts
339
Votes
Pat Lulewicz
  • Realtor
  • Raleigh NC and Greensboro, NC
339
Votes |
297
Posts
Pat Lulewicz
  • Realtor
  • Raleigh NC and Greensboro, NC
Replied

Tim - primary markets that are the largest in the state will always attract the most investors with the deepest pockets; this includes Private Equity funds that are in-play in most primary and secondary markets in NC. Though I agree with you that 1% deals aren't readily available on the MLS, they're still out there in the form of off-market transactions and value-add plays. In addition, you will find that the 1% rule was created to be used primarily as a cash-flow consideration, and as an average and doesn't really consider the other variables to cash flow like property taxes, insurance, CAPEX and vacancy as well as appreciation because that is speculative. In NC, we have pretty low property taxes compared to places like NY or Chicago. It's not unheard of to see an $80K, 2/1 house have property taxes of $400-$700. With that being said, consider a brief, over-simplified case study. Primary markets are much more complex from an appreciation perspective so I will stay away from that:

House 1: $70K in a tertiary market with a $600/tenant with a 20% DP. Yes - these are common in NC tertiaries and even some secondaries. You can probably expect a levered-ROI of 10% with all expenses and reserves considered which could net you $1,500 or so per year. Because its a small market with not much job growth and therefore not much population growth, it'll always be a good, base-hit cash flow market and your long-run appreciation might be 2% per year (or potentially just buoy up and down for 30 years) and rent isn't expected to move much because of the lack of job/pop growth. So over 30 years your projected cash flow is around $45K and appreciation of $60K ($105k total). However during that time, you've replaced the roof ($7K), siding ($6k), windows ($6k), HVAC ($8k), all appliances 2-3 times ($5K), cabinets ($3K), and countertops a few times from wear and tear ($3k). In addition, you've had migrant tenants so there's been 10+ turns resulting in expenses above and beyond the tenant SD and legal costs to try and collect were too high so you covered the difference of $1K each time ($10k). Those 10 turns also resulted in lease-up of 1 months' rent to the PM company ($6,000). Add it all up and your net return turned into ~$51k very quickly but still a modest 3.5x-4x return on your money. The above expenses are conservative and assume the reserves calcs covered other plumbing, repair, etc. surprises.

House 2: $300,000 in a secondary market with a $1,800 tenant. Also common. At the start, a levered-ROI will probably be 0-3%. However, 5 years in, there's a good likelihood that your rents have increased $100-$300/m without a turn needed because a married couple working in finance doesn't want to pay a moving company every 2 years, and their golden retriever (that also earned you a pet fee and pet rent) loves the fenced in backyard. If we consider a 30 year avg rent of $2,200 and ONLY a 3% appreciation (I'd "budget" a bit higher), your net cash-flow expectation is around $120k with appreciation of ~$450K ($570K total). Sure, your roof will be a bit more expense ($10K), HVAC is an HVAC in most cases ($8K), there's more siding ($10K) and windows ($15k), SS appliances aren't that much more ($9k), probably a few extra cabinets ($5k), granite is definitely more than formica ($6k), and you now have a garage door to worry about ($2k). The IT couple doesn't want to move, their dream home is becoming exceedingly more expensive and investors are scooping up inventory similar to yours cash, and every other rental looks the same so they or their similar avatar stay for 6-7 years resulting in 5 turns, max ($9K lease-up fees). Lastly, each turn isn't that much higher because finance-couple took care of the home and want their SD back, and obviously don't want extra damages in collections on their credit score ($3k x 5 = $15K). Your net here is more around $481k or a 8x on your money. BTW, even using that same 2% appreciation as in the tertiary market, your return multiple is still around 4.5x-5x.

Sure it looks awesome to find a solid cash-flow asset, but cash flow is defense against capex and maintenance. Appreciation and pulling equity out to re-invest is the offense that lights up the scoreboard. You can see why people will take a $0 or a small L monthly to buy and hold in primary markets like Charlotte and Raleigh; these places are booming and upward trending home prices will inevitably pull rents up with them with a 1-3 year lag, but it will come.

  • Pat Lulewicz

Loading replies...