Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

6
Posts
8
Votes

Tax Benefits episode -- no mention of REPS

Stephen Lewellis
Posted

I'm a huge fan of the Rookie pod. Bravo to Ashley and Tony for keeping that train moving with content that's consistently helpful and entertaining. Thanks to you both and all of your guests!

I'd love to hear some thoughts from the group on one aspect of the recent tax benefits episode released 12/14/21.

Given that the vast majority of my family's income is attached to a W2, I love learning about the tax benefits of RE investing. In this episode, Ana touts the use of depreciation and cost segregation (presumably for unleashing bonus depreciation) as a way to offset active W2 income, but she makes it sound like it's available to every investor by default. Was anyone else taken aback that there was no mention of the Real Estate Professional Status (REPS) requirement?

For rookies, especially, I found this misleading. With respect to long term rentals, it's my understanding that one (or their spouse if filing jointly) must qualify for REPS in order to use passive RE losses to offset active W2 income. Qualifying for REPS isn't trivial, especially if your W2 is a full time job. I know the situation is different with respect to short term rentals, but it at least seemed like she was talking about RE investing in general, not just STR.

Am I on the right track here? Always looking to learn and find my blind spots. Thanks to Ana for being a great resource to investors and sharing some insights and advice on the pod.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,688
Posts
4,432
Votes
Natalie Kolodij
  • Tax Strategist| National Tax Educator| Accepting New Clients
4,432
Votes |
3,688
Posts
Natalie Kolodij
  • Tax Strategist| National Tax Educator| Accepting New Clients
ModeratorReplied

You're pretty spot on- People CONSTANTLY are mad when they buy REI for tax benefits only to find out there aren't any in the direct way for thier sitaution.

If your AGI is over $150k- you can't use those losses each they (they do accumualte and carry forward, but if your rental makes a $10k loss you can't just count on your income that year being $10k less) 

The exception is RE pro which is not obtainable for most couples who both work w2 jobs. Or with only one rental (even if all someone is doing is managing the properties- likely won't hit the 750 hours requirement) 

But yes people shouldn't buy rentals for tax benefits until discussing what THEIR tax benefits would be with a professional first . 

business profile image
Kolodij Tax & Consulting

Loading replies...