Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Goals, Business Plans & Entities
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago,

User Stats

10
Posts
0
Votes
Shane Humes
  • Investor
  • Wadsworth, OH
0
Votes |
10
Posts

Playing the numbers game without any clue

Shane Humes
  • Investor
  • Wadsworth, OH
Posted

I am new to real estate investing.  I am in a different position than most investors, in that, I have more capital than time.  This is a good scenario for a partnership, but I'm not sure what the standard is for the split. 

If I am in a partnership with one other person to buy and hold single family and small multifamily (2 - 4 units) properties, and I provide the financing along with all of the down payment, and my partner does the hustle work (finding properties, managing properties, etc.), what is the standard way to structure the division of cash flow?  

Thanks for any responses.

Shane

Loading replies...