Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Goals, Business Plans & Entities
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

116
Posts
31
Votes
Martin Sterling
  • Flipper
  • Staten Island, NY
31
Votes |
116
Posts

Would you do this deal? Yeah or Nay and Why?

Martin Sterling
  • Flipper
  • Staten Island, NY
Posted

I'm a wholesaler. First deal negotiation. (second really but the first doesn't count.) I'm about to put a property under contract in New Jersey. After much negotiation, the seller has agreed to the following. Here's the details:

Fully Occupied duplex in rough neighborhood

Leases in place that are performing.

Current Value: Aprox 130k-140k

Sell price: 110k

repairs needed: 20k-45k

Based on 5 comps (according to myself and mentor): ARV is 150K - 180K

I would say that looks pretty crappy based on the 70% rule and wouldn't even ask about it. BUT, I convinced him to do seller financing. 20k upfront (or even less) 90k due in 18 months. I told him the investor would take ownership during this period, if seller doesn't get his money back in the approved period, it's a deed in leiu scenario. Does this make the deal more attractive? What do you guys think?

My assumption was that the investor outlays less cash therefore has greater return.

Making lemons out of lemonaide.

Loading replies...