Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
1031 Exchanges
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 2 years ago,

User Stats

1,578
Posts
1,618
Votes
Amit M.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
1,618
Votes |
1,578
Posts

Higher return DST offerings

Amit M.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
Posted

I recently received a mailer from Kay properties of 2 DST offerings: an 8% and 10% preferred return (net lease income fund 28, LLC and opportunistic income fund 75, LLC). I was surprised as most DSTs I've seen are in the 5-6% return range.

So is there something new here? Is it that due to easily available higher interest rates (for safer investments), DSTs have had to up their game to attract investors? Or have higher return DSTs like this have always been available? I don't follow the DST market closely, so hoping those with in depth DST experience can comment.


It just seems to me that offering higher returns when we’re in a downward market = higher risks (although the above 2 funds claim to have no debt in their structure.) Something isn’t quite adding up here ;) 

Loading replies...