A grand negative cash flow is not the issue.

The main problem with negative cashflow properties is this. 

If both houses were sold in 2024 then the loss will negate the profit from my understanding.

Owner occ developments there is no value associated to the income approach so these props generally speaking will appreciate a lot more as the neighborhoods are much more desirable. builders the last thing they want to do is sell to investors if they are creating owner occupied communities.. rentals degrade the neighborhood and they will be sabotaging their own values to allow a bunch of investors to buy and rent out in their communities.So when you buy new builds keep in mind if its a build to rent community they will NOT appreciate like owner occupied neighborhoods.. might be best to find something already 3 to 5 years old where the stigma of renters dies down.. that would be best to protect your investment.

Some buyers might see this as a bonus, while others may worry about tenant turnover or stigma, so it can affect the price slightly.Sell when the building’s cash flow no longer meets your goals, market conditions are strong, or you’re ready to reinvest into something else.

But, there was also a lot of violence in 1967 which has left a bad stigma on the neighborhood.

Even in towns where they desperately need affordable house if, they can’t get over the stigma of MHPs.The other issue you’ll run into is highest and best use.

This creates a large negative equity position.  

Last year was the first and only year we had a negative cash flow, and that is driven by the anti-landlord west coast sentiment.  

There are people here who have no problem losing hundreds to thousands in negative cash flow monthly.