Condo regimes are popular here and I’m thinking maybe converting mine to a condo regime and sell either the back lot or the front lot with house and keep the other.

The off-market carry regime, plus the fact that there is no requirement for the GP to put any of their own money in, means that the GP is much less aligned with its LPs. 

It is the former because people want it now. the problem started when people is buying without thinking of the risk.most people only want to buy the income stream from rentonomics.the problem with basic investors are they do not understand when we invest to equity or even debt is that we are buying the spread actually.in cheap money financial regime, with interest rate of 1% and cap rate of 7% we have positive 6% spread which I feel the risk/reward is sufficient to proper for any rentonomics to run.but we're in expensive money regime now with interest rate of 5% and cap rate of 3-4% (depending on class) so we have negative spread of 1% where it's guaranteed investor would lose money. there's also issue with supply especially in sunbelt.i meant it's not the fault of GP but it is the fault of LP mosty because they do not understand all these risk.when interest rate is high like these, obvious choice is to move from equity investment into debt investment (conservatively of course). when cash could generate s much as money as when we work, obviously we can also try to add more allocation to cash position rather than equity investment.And all of these are actually predictable, when Fed prints gazzilion tons of money during covid, the problem in 2024 is expected to happen.What?

I recently sold one I had on Seabrook Island because the club/regime/HOA were frequently changing the rules and making it harder to operate smoothly.

I'm sure the people who wanted the wild west of SIDRA type accounts will be probably disappointed with a new regime.

This is where Democracy is a total failure vs autocratic regimes.

It is very much case-by-case and requires understanding of the current tax regime for personal itemized deductions, as well as gambling on the proposed changes to this regime by the next administration.

It is very much case-by-case and requires understanding of the current regime for personal itemized deductions, as well as gambling on the proposed changes to this regime by the current administration.

We don't know if the new regime will be retroactive.In short, we don't know anything.

The city nor our architect understood the structure of the affordable housing regime that allowed this delay.2) our architect was incompetent in moving the project forward.