But as long as its not directly in the flight path, it will be okay. 

All properties are eligible for a cost segregation study as long as they are investment properties.

It seems like the tenant is being respectful, following the rules, and is not being a problem so I think that is what you would tell any other tenants who ask, as long as you have seen the card.

I feel like a Daisy-Chain would muck up my Timeline or even the whole Deal.As long as everything is in writing and I get my Fee, does it matter?

And it can work really well for you as long as you pay attention to the statute requirements.In order to defer all tax you are selling investment real estate and buying investment real estate of at least the same value you sold. 

As long as the lender can finance in the state that you want to buy in, then work with them.

Quote from @Ven Bud: After hearing to lot of bp episodes on negative cash flow, I have a question.I am currently living in my primary residence and planning to purchase an investment property, and obviously it is going to be a negative cashflow (bay area), but I am of the opinion that as long as the rent on the investment property is atleast going to be greater than my current primary residence mortgage it can still considered as positive cash flow investment.The investment property is going to be in a much better location (for office commute, bay area proximity) than my primary residence.

While this doesn’t apply to investment properties, it’s useful for primary residence or house-hacking strategies.3.60-Day Rollover Rule: You can withdraw funds from your IRA and avoid penalties as long as you return the money within 60 days.

Quote from @Reed Rickenbach: John - as long as you are still following strict screening criteria I agree for single family.

Plan is to hold as long as my IRR is higher than 10% What made you interested in investing in this type of deal?