I never said he was breaking the law, I said he was discriminating...... which he is based on the lady having a 3 year old child.If Ms Murphy says "I do not want homosexuals living in my room" she is still discriminating.

Here are some statistics from Sweden:"The survey revealed a high rate of legal divorce among homosexual couples in Sweden.

I'm going to throw my opinion and real life observations out there, please consider it my view of the world as it is, not as I want it to be...15-20 years ago the easiest way to get ahead of the gentrification curve was to follow the artists and homosexual couples into the less desirable neighborhoods.  

(they are $500 under market now, they were $800 under market)Just wanted to confirm my suspicion that landlords in general are more accepting of homosexual people(not homosexuality per say).

HIV+ was associated with homosexual men, and gay rights were not even talked about back then. 

Maybe if you were the 1st homosexual person to buy a home, ever.

They responded like I said Jesus was a homosexual.

Replace ESA with black / family with children / unmarried cohabitants / homosexual / etc and this tactic has been used before.

If a state had a law that covered disparate impacts and homosexuals that would also apply.

The Vatican says that the rape of hundreds of boys by Christian clergy members is more a problem of homosexuality than it is a problem of pedophilia:http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/sep/09092910.htmlSo, I guess that means the Church would be okay with the rape of little girls?!?!