And under that definition, because there was no minimum time in the CZO for how long someone needed to occupy a structure to be considered "living" there, the court used literal dictionary definitions (standard practice in NH as can be seen in the similar case Working Stiff Partners v City of Portsmouth) to determine what constituted "living as a household" as it concerns STRs.The court explicity rejected the idea that this ruling should have larger implications for STRs around the state, and it certainly did not at all in any way prevent municipalities from regulating STRs.

NO is part of the proper tenant training process.From this point forward tell them no to everything and make sure they CLEARLY understand they are not to change, add or remove anything with out your explicate permission.

Anything cheaper should come with a lot of caution.Happy to explicate more if you want me to.

In fact in the lease it explicity says no dish can be installed. 

I can see how my post came off vague, I will work more on getting to the point and explicating my ideas or thoughts!

@Michael ClayI'll give you my opinion on your questions:1) Since you are lending you become the mortgagee and can require both an appraisal and inspection, but you need to make this explicit. I

Rob,Without having been explicity told, I have surmised the same.

I'm not sure it comes down to finessing or being explicit. I

There is no explication needed and a cleaner break.

If that is the goal, the new deed should explicity identify the entire 60% interest being transferred to the trust.