Purchase price: $175,000 Cash invested: $60,000 Sale price: $370,000 We decided to sell this property after successfully BRRRRing it.

The fact that commission is percentage-based is weird because why would someone doing the same thing make double as someone else?

We are now working on the cash out refi.UPDATEWe decided to sell this property.

ThanksAlex I would sell it as is and let someone else decide on it.

Could someone please provide a copy? 

Quote from @Hemed Tov: I would really get with someone in that market that can dig in see what is going on with the market (comps), and also maybe the rehab was not as good of a job of what the market is yielding at 300K property.

the little nuances one learns in the foreclosure bizz... states with redemption rights are very tricky... in Oregon the rights sunset after 6 months.. so many investors if they don't have the rights ( ie can't find the person who lost the house) Or does not want to pay someone who bought the redemption rights and is holding them hostage.. they just wait out the 6 months and go about their bizz...

As someone who doesn't work on commissions, charges flat fees and has no incentive to sell anyone anything, I like to offer a different viewpoint when I see these types of posts. 

Under any scenario, any state, someone who sits on their rights and lets someone get into the weeds to the benefit of the person who sat on their rights, will NOT have those "rights" enforced by the courts.  

Just to be clear, I would only charge them for lost rent, from the date they were to move in until the date someone else started paying rent.Now, would that hold up in court?