@Sean Leahy Try TheseCorporate Accomodations & Relocating:https://nrirelocation.com/https://casago.com/corporate-housing/relocation/https://mykey.com/https://www.furnishedrelocations.com/Traveling Nurses:https://www.axismedicalstaffing.com/housing-partners/#https://www.ayahealthcare.com/travel-nursing/housing/rent-to-travelers/Host Healthcare | Award-Winning Travel Nursing CompanyInsurance Policy Holders/ Corporate Housinghttps://www.alesolutions.com/register-housing/National Corporate Housing - Temporary & Short-Term Furnished Housing RentalsCHBO - Furnished Rental Homes Platform For Midterm Corporate Housing (corporatehousingbyowner.com)MaintenanceContractor Connection | How It Works

In any disputed court action where the court resolves the dispute and determines the prevailing party, the court shall also award to the prevailing party its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs and the non-prevailing party shall be liable to the prevailing party for payment of any court awarded attorneys’ fees and costs.

I frequently see where one party is awarded the property and debt and is mandated to sell or refinance it within a certain timeframe to have the other party removed from the note/mortgage.

My occupancy rate is probably as good as anyone, and one thing I do is never have a high debt load then turn that around and award my tenants with rental rates they can't match elsewhere. 

Quote from @Peter Walther: Quote from @Bob Floss II: I don't know the laws in your area, but tread carefully assuming a judge will award specific performance when money damages are available.  

Normally the escrow agent will want mutual sign off even if its clear the contract terms indicate one party should be awarded the escrow funds.

But then it was a nightmare of communication, we soon realized that we had to do a bunch of songs and dances to convince them to sponsor our deal, it took 4 or 5 days for them to make time to sit down with us only to tell us that we needed to schedule another meeting in another 4 or 5 days to get Tyler on the phone and let us try and convince them to sponsor us and by that time someone else was awarded the deal and we lost out.

Per him, Judge will see how unreasonable he has been in his itemized list and not award a windfall anyway. 

To put a relatively extreme scenario out there, if you offer 3% more than the next guy in cash (no bank debt) and provided a copy of a brokerage account statement showing the cash was available, I am certain you would get the deal.To echo Joshua's comments: how you are planning on financing the deal is hugely contingent on being awarded deals.  

Sometimes 5 in the case of 9% LIHTC deals but all the way up to 15 as I’ve seen in 4% deals.  9% is competitive meaning there’s only a certain amount of projects awarded each year by your states HCR.  4% is not competitive and is usually more appropriate for large projects because 9% will get allocated to projects of smaller size so as to spread the benefit.