We will qualify for a partial exclusion as we lived in half of the duplex meeting the "eligibility test" for that side.

Thinking that you know more than a person who actually took a test to obtain a license is probably a mistake needing corrected.

And even though virtually every sponsor agreement allows me to share investment information with others who might be advising me on it (especially when club members are bound by an NDA), I still ask the sponsor if I can share it, because it's a test.

Very eager to test our ideas by some experienced investors as we continue to learn.

I’m feeling confident about the material, but would love to speak with any recent test takers. 

I understand you want to test out the revenue first.

Also I suggest doing some test ads to see the demand and change price accordingly.

Better to know the shape of the lines before tenants test them for real.Hope this helps, Merry Christmas!

With the upside to increase value throw Brrr,  I’m taking my chips of the table here and going to test the waters there.

If zipcode is important because your ads are only relevant to specific locations, try using a location insertion in the headline that mentions city to offset potentially irrelevant buyers if you can't narrow down by zipcodeI second @Josh McRay's search network/radius reco; for search network you could run a test on a campaign with and one without it or just turn it on in your existing campaign for a couple of weeks