As a result, the economic growth will impact the values of the properties in the surrounding areas for the better. 

As an example if you are invested in three MSA, and one MSA has an economic downturn from say a military base closing, you are better prepared.

I have done home remodeling and repair for a few years and I would say that “flipping” that house would not be economical or profitable.

Stick with C to B class areas (blue collar to lower middle-class people who take good care of their properties), you'l get the best return with the least headaches here. 3) solid job growth, and a diverse economic base, i.e. you want lots of companies employing people, not an area where the lions share of jobs comes from a single sector or small handful of companies. 4) good population growth

You can pay cash for a house; see if one of your left wing professors will lend you the money under terms more beneficial to yourself, of you can move to one of the few remaining countries more closely aligned with your economic philosophy, Cuba or North Korea.

It's economically not sustainable.

What I do for investing is analyze the economics of the local, city, State, National AND GLOBAL markets.

We'd need to know what kind of market is the park in, Ratio of POH to Tenant owned, Economic vacancy of the park and apartment building, rent in the apartment building, expenses ratios for the park and apartment building, utility set up for the park, age of the apartment, possible deferred maintenance. 

agree with @Andrew Syrios  this is a poor scheme fraud with default and economic danger to the owner of the property...

To understand the economics of it: A broker might typically get paid 3% of the lease value for a 5 year lease; so if you rent a 1200 SF space for $2.00/SF, the calculation is:1200 SF x $2.00/SF = $2400/mo * 60 mo = $144,000.  3% of that is $4,320.