I think that the type of tenant that would be attracted to heat and hot water included in rent are the ones that have unpaid utility bills and can't get them in they're own name, and the ones for whom an unexpectedly large utility bill would be a financial burden.

Cutting corners on maintenance limits your ability to attract good tenants and good tenants are the ONLY way to make consistent money.  

Texas and Florida both have the 0 state income tax attraction factor and georgia also has a robust and growing diverse job market. 

I keep seeing people on youtube that post fake "for sale" ads to attract cash buyers.

Thanks Steve, so you are saying that many people have the need to feel connected to the house they are buying, and therefore they would forgo investing in some far out place despite higher returns on their money in those places.If so, what do you think about this, would a potential investor be attracted to a home due to its appearance aside from the ROI?

In 5 years, there is a possibility that the property will be worth much more...and to be locked in at a price for that long with that Tiny down payment does NOT seem attractive at all.I am extremely open to your IDEAS/Suggestions/ADVICE.

In a deep breath pass!

Besides for the obvious pricing implications in certain places it also speaks to the attractiveness of renting for many end renters who lets face it are the end users of the products for buy and hold types. 

I may be way-off here, but you are coming off as extremely emotional right now, and throwing a ton of different stuff on the board as it comes into your mind.I would suggest that you pause, take a deep breath, gather your thoughts, and take the time to write out a post that spells out exactly what is going on, and what guidance you are looking for.Again, I may be off-base, but that is how the posts are coming off to me.  

If you're correct in that the second house is likely to attract families, and the first house will be more likely to attract single military guys, which type of tenant would offer less turnover?