My thinking is account for all expenses and hope that it being a new build will save me some time before having to perform cap ex style repairs (I do have about 50K cash on hand after the closing of this property so i feel comfortable with handling curve balls for a few years) New Build structure and neighborhood/school gives me hope that in 30 years i can still command a decent rent on a property 30 years old instead of trying to take something from 1970 all the way to 2055 and still get decent rent out of it .

I feel like maybe I'm asking for too much with this investment.

I have seen that usually, in a dual agency situation, one party feels like they lost out somehow and it opens up the way too many opportunities for me as the agent to get sued.

Ask them how many units they manage, what they feel market rent for your property is, do the handle repairs in house or use contractors, what mark-up do they charge on repairs, etc. 

I saw a similar post about 7 months ago by "Mike Romano" with a similar question, however I didn't feel like he explained the reason why he was planning to use a HML instead of a standard conventional loan in the first place.

Feel free to DM me for a discount code. 

I was considering our housing options for the move and they fall into two options that I'm considering: 1) Take out a  $60K home equity loan, and a $50K 401K loan, and dip into savings to come up with 20% down on a primary in the HLOC area.2) Rent for a couple-ish years at $3k/month until we save up enough for 20% downThis is sort of how I've been thinking about it: Option 1Pros:1) Only have to move once2) Appreciation on the house in the HCOL area over the two or two + years it would take to save up the down payment if I rented insteadCons:1) Reduced 401K performance2) Feels a little scary to pull equity out with a home equity loan since I've never done this and it was not part of my initial investment strategy3) Less cashflow from primary once it becomes a rental  Option 2Pros:1) Less stress about 401k and home equity loans2) Better 401K performance3) Better cashflow from current primary once it becomes a rentalCons:1) Two years of rent2) Two years of missed appreciationOther info that might or might not be relevant:  We have two modestly cash-flowing rentals besides our primary.

Actually, given the opportunity to generate rental income and the potential for risk reduction via diversification, modest multifamily residences could be a prudent investment.Kindly feel free to ask any specific questions or seek advice before starting your next real estate venture.

All of these get forwarded to me through the system along with any additional information such as address and tenants name.This way the tenant feels that they have a personal way to contact me and I am able to keep everything neat and organized.

Which ones feel more like a home and not a mobile home?