Athena Flint
New Kid from Pittsburgh, PA
30 June 2015 | 12 replies
It has been battle tested in many court rooms already.To your successJosh
Account Closed
LLC - Equity Deal Structure
6 July 2015 | 10 replies
If the deal goes bad (that's when the lawsuits start flying), and you didn't comply with the securities laws, you may owe the investor the entire amount of their investment + fines + attorney's fees + interest + court costs etc.
Max Mac Phail
"Zombie" Foreclosures In Las Vegas, NV
23 July 2015 | 9 replies
After owning in Texas, the HOA is powerless to do anything but collect fines and take you court for payment.
David Briley
Remove a squatter before purchase in Massachusetts
14 April 2016 | 5 replies
Most of the time it has worked out well for me, but I live in a state that favors landlords over tenants.You can probably call the eviction courts and ask them what your options are..
Jim Keller
Private Investor pay's seller for personal property, Good idea/Bad idea?
3 July 2015 | 5 replies
This was the recommendation of retired Oregon Supreme Court Judge that I had as a law professor (b-school not law school).
Henrick Sorenson
Liability Coverage for Tenant Mold Health Issues?
6 July 2015 | 12 replies
Interesting post...a couple of stupid questions:- Tenant gets "sick", claims it was mold, takes you to court - your umbrella insurance will not cover this?
Daniel B.
Tax Trust Sales in Texas
16 August 2015 | 3 replies
These properties are defined as -"Tax Trust Property is property that did not sell at a Constable’s Sale ordered by Court with Judgment to foreclose the tax lien.
Neil P.
NON PAYMENT RENT - EVICT A TENANT NJ
29 July 2015 | 11 replies
If we go to court they show up what happens will the judge order them to pay me or leave?
John Rovin
Pending Release on Previous Owner Mortgage - Title Search Question
7 July 2015 | 6 replies
If I were XYZ, I wouldn't bother with the title claim or going to court to invalidate the sale.
James Wise
Housing discrimination doesn't need intent.
2 July 2015 | 0 replies
Housing Discrimination Doesn’t Need Intent, Supreme Court SaysPosted in Law & Policy, by Robert Freedman on July 1, 2015 Share on facebookShare on twitterShare on linkedinShare on google_plusone_shareShare on emailMore Sharing Services3Much of the country’s attention has been on the United States Supreme Court’s rulings on marriage equality and the Affordable Care Act last week, but the nation’s highest court also handed down an important housing decision that looks at whether a public or private entity can get hit with a federal Fair Housing lawsuit even if it had no intent to discriminate.