@Ryder Meehan has a fun meetup in SF - but mainly focused out of state (except this next meetup's cannabis RE theme ;) And make it down to Milpitas for @Johnson H.'

Here's a quote from an article in yesterday's Tampa Bay Times that'll give you a sense of what's happening:  "The numbers over the past few years reflect a more healthy and sustainable real estate market," says Hillsborough Property Appraiser Bob Henriquez.

The way people get caught is when they change their insurance coverage to reflect that the property is a rental (which you SHOULD DO, by the way, or else a LOT of potential issues will NOT be covered). 

The sun reflects off the windshield ands glares into my front window.

Therefore, once he is gone - you should not have to worry about replacing the locks being considered constructive eviction (as long as you give the keys to the other tenants that is....)YES, you should definitely issue a new lease to reflect the change in the named tenants.

I realize this thread is a year old but the discussion still reflects our current situation.We have a 1/1 upstairs Condo and our Lease Agreement states any people living there in addition to the named Tenants will result in $150 additional rent. 

(as is I'm paying XX per month for functioning AC, and it could have been fixed by now, and LL is changing the bargain by willfully refusing to fix -> reduce the rent by an amount reflecting the monthly value of the AC usage).2) Tenants will remember this and **** over the *** hat Landlord. 

Empty units should be reflected in your offer just like needed repairs.

The opinions I give may not reflect the laws in your state so consult a local real estate attorney.

as a part agent myself, I would say, it doesn't matter of you call your self a part time full time of whatever time, the amount you earn reflects the quality of agent you are.