mortgage reduction products In either case most of what is used to sell the product is either a half truth or ridiculous.

Hmmm, not sure why he believes buy and holders (landlords) are "by definition" expecting the value to go down.My understanding was most buy and holders are still looking to buy at a discount (much like rehabbers) to have an out if things don't work out (being a landlord ain't for everyone) or if they need a cash infusion (or simply a debt servicing reduction).I certainly don't expect my properties to go down in value long term... though in fairness in the short term I'm not altogether worried about it.

They did not roll with a 100 pound weight roller.

., any addition or reduction of value) would be the "executor" of the "estate", whoever that might be.

The principil subject of this discussion appears to be the reduction of principal over a period of time, such period of time referred to as the amortization period or amortization of the loan.Loan constants are really an old school method of computing a loan payment and may not be correct depending on the amount and interest rates that may be carried out to fractional amounts, beyond eights.

You always want to be careful with reductions though because there can be a fine line between looking flexible or desperate creating two different types of buyers.

I also find it rather easy to take a list of comparables prepared for me by a broker, or through a discussion with an appraiser to feel very comfortable with my valuation.As to the money earned on commissions, I have regularly been able to deal directly with the listing agent and negotiated a reduction in their commission should I choose to make an offer on their listed property.Again, having a real estate license is probably great for someone that hasn't been involved in real estate for very many years, but I would come down on the side of Tim in regards to the liability factor.

In turn I would then deal with the eviction for a reduction in price on the property.

If you add in Appreciation, Cashflows, Mortgage Reductions, Rent and Expenses and their increases over time, Tax benefits or costs, etc.

I don't think that argument holds weight.