To rent the home, I would lose about $2,500 per month (based on comparable rents in my area, property management fees, etc).Both options loose the same amount by roughly 2 years, and by this time, I still will not have built up much more equity in the home to make selling it a break even unless there is price appreciation by then.My dilemma is this: I speculate that my home will not appreciate much in the next 3-5 years due to the rapid pace of development in the surrounding area.In 5-10+ years, maybe, but by then I'll have bled $150,000 - $300,000.I have thought about this a lot and feel that I mar'-too close to the problem to see the best solution.

This method provides an indication of value based on the property's rents.

This is a post based off of curiosity.

The structure is mainly appreciation-based, which minimizes tenant and maintenance risk. 

These things going to court you have to Steel Man the argument and if you can do that with a good base for your side being in the right/wining the argument then you may be able to win in court.

View report*This link comes directly from our calculators, based on information input by the member who posted.

So in lieu of responding directly to the resident(s), I figured I'd touch base with the BP community to provide some insight.

We have tiered returns based on investment amount and time in the deal.

When the tax base disappears so do essential services.

If B-E are all treated straight pro rata based on equity in that class, then I am less concerned.