This information sharing is allowed under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) with the following considerations: Necessity: The information shared should be limited to what's necessary for the new servicer to handle the loan effectively.

I'll take this into consideration.

When evaluating property management services, pricing is often a primary consideration.

Anything you discussed prior to drafting the lease that didn't make it into the lease is considered "puffery" and will not be given any consideration in court. 

It also has considerable risk involved as well. 

I’d take into consideration the quality of the unit and how recently it was renovated.

In that scenario, I'm trying to decipher if it follows normal partnership rules or if there are special considerations.

The 16% ROI includes the loan pay down after year one coming from the amortization schedule along with breaking out other ROI considerations. 

Is that consideration tied to the property or the house itself?

I continue to see more and more investors, either doing private, lending or investing in debt, not take into consideration the risk.What do I mean by that?