To be fair, judging by the “ask about the guru” posts on here, many people might not realize this.

The standard connection worked fine with minor syncing bug every now and then but the whole purpose is to make this an easier process..so now with Vrbo we will now be responsible for collecting and submitting state tax, damage insurance for the what if situations( which from the plans seen can be like $60 per listing), collecting payments..ya I don’t think so.  

I can't remember the name, but if someone post's the website, Im pretty sure I'll remember.

For instance, while applying Texas-based legislation, the state's strong preference for ADR processes like mediation and arbitration is an important factor to take into account.

Make sure you are in a state that doesn't have licensing requirements for private lenders and make sure you work through a title and escrow agent so that your money is insured with a lender's title insurance policy and ABSOLUTELY make sure your LLC is listed as a loss payee on the property hazard insurance.

In addition my drivers license which they have a copy of show that I live in a completely different state. 🤷‍♂️ 

Here is text taken from the HOUSABLE website for Oakland:Utility ConnectionsCategory One: No new or separate utility connection shall be required.Category Two: A new or separate utility connection may be required, but the connection fee or capacity charge shall be proportionate to the burden of ADU on the water or sewer system.Here are definitions of the ADU categories from the City of Oakland website:CATEGORY ONE ADU: Involves either conversion of space within an existing Single-Family Dwelling, or conversion or rebuild of an existing accessory structure; includes no expansion of the existing building envelope other than up to 150 sq. ft. for purposes of accommodating ADU access and egress only.CATEGORY TWO ADU: Involves construction of a new detached or attached structure, including an exterior addition to an existing structure to accommodate the ADU, in conjunction with a proposed or existing Single-Family dwelling.It seems that Oakland is making things confusing with the language they are using, but I still believe that my original interpretation is correct based on the State Assembly Bill. 

Not sure if @Ronald Rohde still posts here but he is probably a good starting point for any TX transactions. 

The question is, is the "problem tenant" violating state or local law or the lease agreement? 

Before everyone comments there is more to underwriting than projecting exit cap rate and it varies by market, know that I already know that, and this post is regarding a general concept and a question posed get your thoughts. 2.