If the buyer has to take the risk of substantial rent increases and pay full market price why should the seller by rewarded?

Dan, Risk vs Rewards is probably a more appropriate way of addressing your question.

I would consider the partnership as if your financial contribution is rewarded by success of the venture but your management of the venture is rewarded as expense prior to determining profit.

And I'm guessing the "insurance" provider would have a pretty strong case that they don't have to pay out.There is great reward in using Subject To, legally and ethically and correctly.

It's unique but definitely rewarding if you know what you're doing.In terms of proximity... it's a bit of a flight.

BRRRRing is one of the more rewarding strategies but they are also higher risk and require more work. 

This takes time but the rewards are worth it. 

See if you can structure a partnership with a relative or friend that puts the least amount of risk on them and gives them the highest reward.  

, but the most fun and rewarding. 

I've seen the huge homes in Irvington rent at $1,500/mo as well, but it's always roommate complications and other troubles in those types of homes.Irvington is fun and safe to invest in, but it will not likely bring the fast rewards like the Brookside park area will over the next couple of years, but those 2 years are going to suck.