Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 12 years ago,

User Stats

488
Posts
121
Votes
Danny Day
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Houston, TX
121
Votes |
488
Posts

Can a partnership increase net profit?

Danny Day
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Houston, TX
Posted

What are your thoughts on a partnership agreement for rehabbing / selling? More so I'm talking specifically about silent partners, who want to take a profit but not do any work.

How would you structure this agreement?

I've had someone who wants to take on a partnership with me on a 50/50 split, and wants to split costs 50/50 - but he is out of state, and would not control rehab. I would be in charge of locating, inspecting, closing, rehabbing, selling the property.

Not sure if this is the best arrangement on 1 deal. Could there be a benefit to scale?

Thanks in advance

Loading replies...