Adding a certain type of co-beneficiary (not family or business partner) to a trust will bring all of the protections that the law allows towards personal property, a judge may not be able to order the sale of the real estate to satisfy a judgement due to the limited partition rights by outside parties.

It's never satisfied and never gives a return on investment.

I consider solar every couple of years and have not been satisfied with the life of the panels.

But in general more expensive areas that might have $400k fourplexes probably do not have good rent ratios.Does anyone know of an area that satisfies this particular criteria?

As fund assets under management (AUM) grow, it becomes increasingly difficult to find enough high-quality stocks that both meet the original investment criteria and have enough liquidity to satisfy the growing fund size."

Other questions might include... your investing experience, operationally how are you going to manage the property (or are you going to hire it out), they might question your team and so on...If your agent works with investors regularly he/she should be able to recommend to you local lenders that would be able to satisfy your needs. 

While this is not normal, it was very satisfying.

So I've changed my search to better areas where I'm looking to satisfy the 1% rule, and hopefully avoid the headaches I mentioned above. 

If we take them to court and get a judgment, and then report it to SEC 8, their voucher is put on hold, and they cannot get the RFTA reissued to find a new place until they satisfy my judgment.  

My question is: what are the pros and cons on 1 note versus 11 notes, and is there a good solution to satisfy both parties?