Unfortunately ,my other properties are in Texas and Alabama so it is not practical for me to manage.

The second package is $29 its just online practice testing for a 45 day access.

I work with the law firm that’s investigating the practices - it’s a nationally recognized consumer-rights firm that takes on significant cases.

Giving up your leverage reduces your ROI percentage, increases your exposure to liability, and hinders you from making more purchases.Of course there have been too many who have "over-leveraged" but I am speaking from responsible leverage practices and not the opposite.

I don't believe there is any written rule that restricts a bank from financing their own properties, but it's more of a stigma, the property was taken as collateral on a deal that failed and now they agree to do it again, it's just a poor lending practice.

By narrowing their focus, they are able to strike when they find the deal.Disclaimer: While I’m an attorney licensed to practice in PA, I’m not your attorney.

They also have high thermal shields and neat glass so the windows practically clean themselves.

In a previous business I had my top employee was practically my partner and my right-hand man.

i do know back in NYC, the more code violations, the more likely we were to get a listing from the troubled owner, but as an investor not sure if i would take that same approach unless the troubled owner is practically ready to give the property away =D

What odd practices have you seen other landlords using?