Yeah on point #2, I agree. 

In a recent discussion on BP, it appears the Boston has outlawed STR's in similar fashion.If your rental does not work for long term tenants, you may be wasting your time if the local city changes the STR regulations.Additionally, I agree that the owner should be informed. 

I already politely declined attending but I agree with some statements above that it’s good business and we (tenants and I) are on a closer interaction platform (I’m usually in the neighborhood, quickly address any issues that come up which are minimal) and potentially in the future they will rent longer or purchase a home from me.

@Jay Hinrichs I agree with 99# of what you said I’ve spent almost 15 years in government built housing and there is one thing you can say about ItAcross the board it’s an abysmal failure.

@Ned Carey I agree, I don’t go to closings.

@Joan-Marie Pagan I agree that you will need to vet the TK companies prior to investing.

I agree with Chris, at the end of the day it’s what works for you. 

As long as both parties agree, the HA shouldn’t have a hard time with it.

In my area even if a housing authority doesn’t have enough budget to “absorbe” the recipient holder, they usually agree to all them to port and administer their process, as long as the housing authority they port from will carry the budget and reimburse the new HA.

There shouldn’t be any extra charges for mobilization or other upfront costs since he is so far into the contract.If not, then having given proper notices and record retention is important in “termination for default”.Otherwise, you guys need to figure out how to agree to part company.