Again, not a lender but pure investor. 

From a purely spacial standpoint, it would be difficult to provide road access and utilities to the area behind the house without either purchasing more land or demolishing the house.

I would argue that rental properties typically do not appreciate as much nominally than homes purchased for pure appreciation or flipping. 

@Garrett GasserTitle companies earn money by pure volume of transactions.

It might make more sense as an ADU purely for the 'cool' factor, which you can charge a higher rate for.

But if a pure investment property, I haven't heard of being able to do 10% down from a regular Fannie Mae lender.  

The only downside profession, I see is if your a pure "Financial" investor.

I personally like Maumelle, maybe the best description for me there would be “pure suburb”.  

Most buyers in our market do not purchase for pure investment purposes, as better cash flow can be derived in any number of other markets.

I'm guessing those are better for more involved rehabs vs pure cosmetics.Some PMs will simply charge you an hourly rate, and some will charge you a markup, and some will use their internal (paid) employees to do most of the work and charge you for their time.