I think it works because our strengths and interests are so different we naturally veer to our own lanes and shine in areas where the other isn't as strong, making us better as a team.

Legislation of that nature is not in the best interest of either tenant or landlord.

HID lights naturally him because of the transformer inside them.

-I am up front with them about exactly what to expect as a tenant-I make it clear that they are a potential customer, and I intend to treat them as such, as long as they understand the nature of the lease and reasonable requests. 

I think it's a good place to start and a natural progression:1.

Here are some disadvantages of SFR compared to MF:- not as easy to scale to a large number of doors (very few people will own more than 30-50 SFR)- more paperwork: one mortgage and one insurance policy for every single tenant- value is only a function of appreciation, forced or natural, not a function of income- only one tenant under each roof The last argument only holds water for medium and large MF, because on a duplex the roof is literally (almost) the only thing you don't have duplicates for: 2 kitchens, 2 bathrooms, 2 HVAC etc) - Many of the arguments made for MF do not apply in my opinion for 2/4 family (Small MF).

The long-term tenant, the 99% government funded section 8 nature of the tenant, and the instant positive cashflow of $650-700 per month on a $1,000 rent.

Even though my LLC will show it was created in 2018, I assume that a lender would accept tax returns from the previous LLC if the name of the business, clients, and nature of the business all remained the same in the ownership change. 

The sagacious tone of the content I found to be very insightful, and the lighthearted delivery is very efficacious in nature. 

I am also looking at a property that is "luxury" in nature (relatively speaking - not Manhattan luxury, just the rents are $1,100 to $1,500) , and wonder if that's a bad move if the economy turns.