
30 March 2017 | 10 replies
If the deal can't get funded, it's typically protecting you by telling you the deal is not so good.

15 February 2017 | 23 replies
Also, does anyone think these amateur MF house hackers are putting the properties in an LLC to protect themselves in such an event?

14 February 2017 | 8 replies
Also, always protect yourself.

20 February 2017 | 4 replies
It's an asset protection strategy, I'm sure there are others.

4 March 2017 | 26 replies
Have you researched the need for a LLC outside of BPs to determine actual chance of needing the protection.

4 April 2017 | 22 replies
Besides all this, LLC is not the best way to go if you are just starting with a small or no portfolio to protect, especially in CA where it will cost you $800/yr CA state franchise tax, separate tax returns, and setup fees ... you can just get a $1M or $2M umbrella insurance policy under your name and the properties for some protection ... much less cumbersome and expensive.
15 February 2017 | 7 replies
I see so many out of State buyers purchase an asset on a whim and then talk to a local PM to only find out they paid way too much and it's located in a rough area...I'm a fan of LLC's and lots of asset protection.
21 February 2017 | 18 replies
I dont have personal experience with either, but I have tried to protect myself from both.My application has a spot on it where they are required to list an emergency contact person who can assist in their move-out if they become deceased, hospitalized (long-term), or incarcerated.

22 February 2017 | 9 replies
The sellers are trying, like most, to protect themselves from the unknown, just like you.

25 February 2017 | 7 replies
You care for the health of the goose to protect the flow of eggs.