![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/418457/small_1621450401-avatar-danielr39.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
7 November 2015 | 6 replies
Hi my name is Daniel but most call me Danny.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/66021/small_1621413758-avatar-djdietz.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
12 August 2016 | 4 replies
@Daniel DietzYes to one.For two, fathers are disqualified parties but brothers and uncles generally are not deemed disqualified parties, so while it may be deemed aggressive, it is not prohibited on the surface if the father is not the father of one of the sons mentioned and only IRAs and non-disqualified parties are investing.For three, it is similar to two except the father's IRA is removed from the equation, so it is not prohibited on the surface since brothers and uncles are not disqualified parties.However, under both 2 and 3 above, the IRS can always challenge both scenarios, and unless you can prove to the IRS that such transactions could have been made without the need of the other parties, they can still deem it prohibited.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/290783/small_1695049726-avatar-dcastellano88.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
31 May 2018 | 15 replies
Hi Daniel,I am in your situation as well, although I am also investing from another country!
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/213424/small_1621433669-avatar-rtb40.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
26 August 2016 | 18 replies
@Daniel WurlIt's in inner city Milwaukee where houses are sold for $25-$30K, not sure any developers would want to build on in this market.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/713543/small_1621495922-avatar-danielt73.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
29 May 2017 | 2 replies
Hey, guys, My names is Daniel Twigden.My family and I live east of Lodi in California but are ready for a change.