I can't imagine a more frustrating and dangerous scenario than to try to invest in an unfamiliar area that meets your financial proformas but where you don't know anybody, have access to on and off market opportunities, have relationships with trades people and property managers. 

ARMs are dangerous if you get caught with a rising interest rate and have a lot of other loans to

Maybe if you’re a guy, “comfort” would be enough to get you to stay, but as a woman who has felt threatened herself, I would never try to convince someone to stay in a dangerous situation.

I think it's very dangerous to chase returns & to seek out the very highest ROI possible without considering risk. 

Leverage is a wonderful but dangerous tool. 

Obviously, applying the same 1% cutoff  to a property in a C- neighborhood is dangerous.

Borrowing capital from a credit card is dangerous unless it is a short-term plan.

I wonder how many landlords/pms do a video walk through of their properties on a bi-annual basis to document that no potentially dangerous conditions exist.

For federal income tax reporting this means the SMLLC is dissolved and there's no distinction between the SMLLC's assets/income and the owner's assets/income.The tax treatment of you holding the property directly vs through a SMLLC taxed as a disregarded entity will be 100% the same. 

The con would be hail damage to roofs, high property taxes, and foundation issues (the cost of repair is much lower than CA). yup I got a first hand look at those danger points in Texas had to replace roofs had to jack up houses and fell out of my chair when we got the tax bill.