@Steve Olafson nothing higher than a 7 cap on what appears to be a value add play?

This is a very tough piece to nail down.But once you line all three of these pieces up, now you have an investing network set-up. 

These were gaping holes, not just nail holes. 

I'm not an agent in Utah, but @Mike Palmerseems to have hit the nail on the head regarding the appraisal contingency.  8.2(a) and 8.2(b) are the clauses that 24(c) refers to.  

All staples, nails, tack strip and adhesives have to be removed.

Mud, tape, nails, sprayer tips, etc are all provided by the contractor and he knows this up front to include in his quote.  

Dont get me wrong, Privy has a huge benefit if there are a hard cap on users.  

Aside from virtually all of them requiring some kind of religious bent, they are all pretty clear in stating that they are *not* health insurance, mostly because they either don't cover a lot of things at all, have some clear cap on paying for procedures, or cap expenses per incident. 

Sure,It will be difficult to get 10% net cap on A class.I have been looking at multifamily complexes for the last 6 months and whenever I get a B class complex sent to me showing around a 10% net cap it always catches my eye. 90% of the time the expenses are not genuine and property management isn't included in those expenses either.

I’d be interested in joining your squad - I’ve got the marketing and comma nailed, just need a good cleaner and a repairman.