And I agree with you property managers suck and they are not trustworthy so I would not get back into that, I would continue to try to manage them yourself, stay positive.

While it is possible to continue the eviction after the sale it would require a motion to substitute the Plaintiff (obviously not a very common motion) that could give the Defendant 14 days to respond, and regardless would necessitate an order before they could proceed.

, and continue to this day to cashflow $130 per month.

My lender said we could buy, stay a year and move 20 times, and continue to get low down and low interest rates.  

We make enough to make all payments and is we just continued as normal everything would pay itself off.

Last week the tenant asked tor a professional steam clean on an already very clean carpet.My question is, do I continue to honor these requests despite the flaws being present when the lease was signed?

The negative reaction was caused by the Fed's reinforcement of it's plan to continue it's $50 billion in monthly quantitative tightening. 

This particular property was renovated through the turnkey company and sold to a client 4 years ago.Before purchasing, I asked if the existing property management company would continue to manage the property and they said yes.6 days after I closed, I was told that they’d decided not to manage my property and I only found this out after I asked about prospective tenants.On top of that, the house needs repairs beyond what I initially thought.Has this happened to anyone?

Fortunately he still allowed work to continue up to then.

It seems risky for him to continue on with transferring ownership on Jan 1st especially if the new owner suddenly has buyer's remorse... couldn't she just easily back out, take her deposit back and walk away?