
8 June 2008 | 6 replies
I will spill over into June...5 more contributers to my website for articles with backlinks.2 PR pieces out2 additional interviews with monthly publications1 additional strategic partner located.

21 June 2008 | 7 replies
He tells me that one county over it can get crazy in court.For instance, one particular magistrate makes him spend tweny minutes proving his case, grills him pretty intensively, and requires that he produce every piece of paper that might be remotely relevant.Worse yet, even if the defendant does NOT show up, the magistrate still makes the LL exhaustively prove his case and jump through the same hoops.Maybe I'm spoiled because locally I've never faced that kind of nonsense.But here's my question: is that type of goofiness the norm or the exception to the rule?

18 April 2012 | 13 replies
Selling 500 homes at a time when you are holding several hundred thousand properties is more a marketing piece to show them in a positive light.

26 June 2012 | 27 replies
You will have better piece of mind knowing it is there and less likely to make rash decisions that could hurt you a lot.5) the property SHOULD be over 1000 SF or you will have a limited buyer's pool.6) The terms are steep, but if I couldn't turn a profit even with those terms, I would think twice before getting my family involved.In summary, I think the requirments of you proposed lender are prudent and reasonable.

20 May 2012 | 5 replies
I'm debating on replacing the broken pieces and priming and repainting the whole house..

18 February 2015 | 49 replies
My first impulse was to cut the cord into about 15 pieces and throw them over the fence to his backyard.

24 July 2014 | 7 replies
If any pieces get messed up, it's an easy peel and replace job.

2 February 2014 | 21 replies
What's the best way to learn RE development without actually going out and buying a piece of land then praying that you can find a good team to build a house on?

14 September 2023 | 18 replies
Is there a case where the following occurred, in which the IRS has claimed a victory for the defendant under the following:-High W-2 income earner invests in short term rentals-taxpayer is not a real estate professional -offers rental for less than 7 days on average-materially participates and more hours than anyone else etc etc (100 hours and so forth)-files it on schedule E as passive and does not offer substantial services to be classified as schedule C - cost segs a million dollar purchase for 200k and deducts from W-2 income to owe no taxes There are a ton of moving pieces with this, and the more complicated something is with the IRS the worse it is for the taxpayer when dealing with an audit.

28 October 2007 | 6 replies
Then at the end there is a blank area where you can add your own clauses if need be.