For the most part, I don't think investors benefit by directly marketing to attorneys.Attorneys prefer their fiduciary clients (executors and administrators) get maximum market exposure by listing through an MLS. 

they did have other categories for expenses, I just combined them to reduce the size of the post..they had these as well...Salaries & Related (10,050) (10,151) (10,252) (10,355) (10,458)Marketing (660) (667) (673) (680) (687)Repairs & Malntenace (5,935) (5,994) (6,054) (6,115) (6,176)Administrative (3,350) (3,384) (3,417) (3,452) (3,486)Turnover (1,740) (1,757) (1,775) (1,793) (1,811)Management Fees 4.00% (11,588) (11,874) (12,159) (12,452) (12,752)Utilities (15,840) (15,974) (16,110) (16,247) (16,386)It is not value add.... 

If it states that all monies received are first credited to any late fee or administrative charge, then applied as rents collected, then to 10% management fees then to the owner, then you're sunk, you agreed.

Yes, I sure did. it was to pay for additional administrative and/or additional activities required which were unforeseen at the time the lease was made, the agreed rents were also a tad under market rents and fees were not cumulative adding one infraction on top of another, so even with additional charges rents were not excessive.The basis was for the time required to address these unforeseen matters, charge was by the hour and the time spent or claimed was actual or my estimate and never excessive and was rarely used.The lease was approved under HUD regulations by/and our City Attorney for low/moderate income tenants under an economic development program where a "funny money" loan was assumed on the property, I bought the property from the city.  

plus the area's really coming back from the drug infested place it used to be.daniel

Well what I found out from neighbors was that Vampires lived/resided in the house,....actually they were night people that slept all day and sold drugs all night.

We also know that the administration has been toying with the idea of 12 or 24 months, so anyone that is not acquiring with the intent to hold is taking some degree of risk.

[SYNOPSIS REMOVED BY ADMINISTRATOR - ONLY AUTHORIZED USERS MAY POST IN DEALMAKING SECTION - YOU MUST HAVE AT LEAST 10 POSTS ELSEWHERE TO POST THESE DETAILS]

The addicts are going through withdrawals and pleading for more access to debt and don't yet realize that it is the debt drug that caused the withdrawals, not the absence of debt.

As when wolves are allowed to guard the hen house, it seems irresponsible to commit over $4,000 per taxpayer to an exiting administration possessing the same deregulatory principles that played a major role in the creation and neglect of the current economic crisis.The Treasury Secretary’s deregulatory ideology was overwhelming, and therefore diluted when the details of the $700 billion were expanded from a 3-page proposal to over 450 pages of implementation regulation.