When purchasing a non-performing senior/primary note, does an investor have 100% control of the exit strategy no matter the amount of equity possessed by the borrower?

The way I read that, the seller could at any time in perpetuity come back and devalue the property by removing that structure.It sounds like you need an attorney to advise you on the best course of action, but at the very least, a claim of "adverse possession" is worth looking at.

An investor should only focus on asset classes that possess compounding returns realized through compounding interest.

I know out our way to find a home with someone's personal possessions in Situ is pretty rare. 

I then proceeded with the the steps necessary to have a writ of possession and the sheriff then served it. 

The attorney at the title company said if they cannot find the owner of record to sign a quit claim deed, he said the next option would be to file an adverse possession suit and quiet title action.  

We sent the letter and had to wait 10 days of no response from tenant to gain possession of the unit.

I believe she is moving out currently and I already have someone who wants to move in immediately after she vacates.My question is, do I need to file again for writ of possession and go through that process, or is there a form or statement I can have her sign that says shes going to be moving out and that she is forfeiting the lease? 

So the banks have no obligation to pay property taxes after they have foreclosed and take possession of the property?

If Bob forecloses, sells, what ever, and then the property is brought to come back into his possession at a lower value (remember Bob has that 100K attachment) then Bob could have some explaining to do, AND the ones who conveyed that transaction.