Pets, yes, but with restrictions.

It could also be argued that US investment firms made the investments appear safe to foreign and domestic investors.

(company contributions, foreign or domestic, are a completely separate discussion)My question was, are you okay with foreign COUNTRIES (i.e., governments) influencing our elections with campaign contributions?

I am rehabbing a house with pet urine stains throughout the upstairs subfloor.

I had to allow a 15lb dog in the property though but I took a nice pet fee and made strict rules (new carpet).

Potential tenants don't even get to see the place or receive an application if they don't pass our pre-screening conversations (where we talk about income, reasons for moving, job history, credit and criminal history, pets, etc.).The first person who passes the screening call, sees the place, and hands us the filled out application with the $25 gets the background check.

 $200 pet fee, $25 per month per pet.

But the house just happens to be next door to another that I already own, and it's not in bad shape, other than the pet odor issue.

They're lease was ending February 1st so we gave them the option of $300 pet deposit + $25/mo rent increase or get rid of the dogs or move.  

In other words, I think some people believe there is some sort of cachet associated with using the term in that way...In terms of just pure incorrect spelling, my top pet peeve spot goes to people who use "loose" when they mean "lose"...until the Internet, I never realized this was a common mistake...