![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1602581/small_1621514071-avatar-scottk231.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
27 January 2020 | 20 replies
I refer to this as a "cash like substance".
27 January 2020 | 7 replies
These line items are meant to be reserves you stash away for a rainy day, so there's no harm in over-estimating them.
29 January 2020 | 5 replies
Its more important to have the intent correct: ie 'no burning of any substance' to cover smoking then not to have any mention.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1265364/small_1621510805-avatar-jacobr129.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
26 February 2020 | 10 replies
It could be worth it if you find a big enough non-disclosure but it seems unlikely (but no harm checking).
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1182189/small_1621509956-avatar-brettp56.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
3 March 2020 | 32 replies
However, you can only harm the bull if it is a danger to yourself or others, not property.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1674511/small_1621514681-avatar-lindac147.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
12 March 2020 | 10 replies
@Linda Chanthakhinh No harm in sending a contract to the seller to see if it gets a response.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/373839/small_1630409303-avatar-justinohio.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
12 March 2020 | 75 replies
@Nathan ClaireThanks for the substance and silliness ;-)A modification/addition to the BRRR method I’m considering are ADU’s/Accessory Dwelling Units.
7 March 2020 | 43 replies
There’s likely going to be an EPIDEMIC harm to remodelers handling harmful materials, such as cutting hardibacker etc without protection.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1572311/small_1696975914-avatar-zachl72.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
29 March 2020 | 17 replies
Your responses containing remarks such as “increasing liability insurance” or “doing more harm than good” are just petty.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/579333/small_1621493034-avatar-pauls143.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
28 March 2020 | 27 replies
Thankfully no Individuals or cabins were harmed but a few fences were destroyed.