(looks like Oakland is 3rd most dangerous city)3.

Holding one property for appreciation and losing money while owning a property for cash flow to offset can be very dangerous .

Probably not, otherwise you would not be cobbling together such a complex transaction.We specifically tell clients not to pursue this strategy of personal funds plus plan funds plus debt.The internet, or some other investor you may know, or even a sales rep at a self-directed retirement firm are not tax attorneys, and the fact that they might mention such a structure is worthless and dangerous.

It is not dangerous by any means but there is significantly more action there than in Folsom.  

I am sure you can somewhere within that patch of territory.  

Do not invest in any city on Neighborhood Scouts’ list of the 100 most dangerous US cities.Inflation compensating - Every time you go to the store, the same basket of goods costs more and more.

Hi all,Looking for some advice on Lennar Territorial Commons Dayton, MN township.

We do restrict certain "dangerous" breeds of dogs. 

Furthermore, how can I effectively grow my real estate portfolio quickly, yet without venturing into high-risk territory?

James,that questions has a lot of open territory.