I'm a bit confused by this part:This document does not affect any of the following: (1) Retentions. (2) Extras for which the claimant has not received payment. (3) The following progress payments for which the claimant has previously given a conditional waiver and release but has not received payment: Date(s) of waiver and release:________________________________________ Amount(s) of unpaid progress payment(s): $_____________________________ (4) Contract rights, including (A) a right based on rescission, abandonment, or breach of contract, and (B) the right to recover compensation for work not compensated by the payment.In my case, does it work?

If you tried to gross up the sales price more to compensate for their capital gains, that would increase the sales price more and just increase their capital gains.

@Nicholas CookIn indiana there are no laws that allow a tenant to withhold rent, or rent concessions based on how fast a repair was made.If the tenant believes and can prove the house is not habitable or some issue that needs to be addressed, they can move out breaking the lease, and not be held liable for doing so.Beyond the law, if this was a situation that got drawn out weeks, I could see some compensation being appropriate.

The value is tied only to the lease with very little compensation to the dirt so once that period is over the second generational tenant will likely pay much less than the first. 

I attempt to read all the information I can regarding the RE investment industry, but I don't think there is enough time in my lifetime (and I'm only 35), to catch up to the years of work contained within this site.I post about this on my own, not expecting nor having received any type of compensation for my thoughts, but I wanted to share this with all my fellow newbies out there who are on the fence about paying for a membership.  

This piece of property is separated by a road for both of us and it has a separate PID for both of us.So now with pending new neighbors I'm considering asking original owner if they would consider to give us a permanent right of way easement for access across their land.I know the easement would need to be prepared by an attorney, and also would have recording costs to both parties to add this to titles.Just want to know if anyone has done something like this and what you think is reasonable compensation to offer them, I of course would pay attorney fees and recording fees for us both.

Also, watch out for compensating people for investor referrals because that implicates the broker-dealer laws. 

Mario,It is true that taxes are high in NJ, but everything else is high to compensate.  

Don't FORCE them to use that lender or they will assume unlawful kickbacks are going on & who knows maybe their existing lender does non-warrantable too (but obviously throw out any retail big box bank offers... as always, but especially true here).If the buyers gripe that the non-warrantable option has a slightly higher rate (it will), offer a seller credit to buy the rate down.Non-warrantable condo end-lenders are a little extra conservative in most other regards to compensate for taking this risk, so don't get up in a huff if closing is two weeks slower than it otherwise normally is in your market. 

if I am not mistaken you would have to be licensed to manage other people's property and get compensated for it.