So i put together some some numbers, and tried to run some calculations.The numbers:I was doing this for fun, so i just wanted to keep this hypothetical simple1) I decided that the house in this situation would follow the 70% rule2) I figured an ARV of $100,000 would be easy to work with3) I could'nt find any numbers on what other people are charging for rates on deals that       they are exiting with owner financing with, so i chose to just go with 3.9% because I know   that interest rates are super low right nowWhy i thought owner financing might be a cool exit:1) You can get a large down payment for your property (30% in this hypothetical)2) You can generate a long term cash flow while avoiding the costs that are associated with renting3) Your investment has physical collateral; the property that you are holding the note onNow it's time for the Hypothetical: Say you got into a property using the 70% rule and financed the deal with cash as and were also the contractor with the intent to flip the house for $100,000 house (ARV).

I'm OK if they make an educated decision not to go that route ... what I try to avoid is the seller not fully understanding the structure of the deal.

Physical Characteristics (e.g., bed, baths, SQFT, etc.) 12. 

I've asked around about owner financing and there have been a of of no's and then bad deal structures.  

The property has a severe physical defect3.

Structural repairs, lead paint abatement, high tenant turnover.....

., I moved to Hawaii last year from the mainland and had to open a bank account here because the only physical ones that exist on the island are all local.

Their fee structure might scare you off if you are thinking volume.

He's in his late 80s and he tells me he just wants to sell cause he doesn't have much time left.Anyone have a good way to structure this deal?

I will do some renovation and I welcome all insights into setting a passive income structure that will best leverage six fugures into seven figures in the next decade.