I'm not sure who worked on it, but they did a "horrible" job.

She should be set for life financially and it be horrible to see her lose that.

Flint is a horrible idea; there is not solution for the problem.

Appreciation seems horrible, not sure what the rent goes for in that market, but worth a look.

Traffic in 610 and 10 is horrible but it's getting better but you can avoid it easily depending on choosing the right place to live.

It would be a similar process as if you were buying in California, but since the lenders know the local market, it is easy for them to combat a horrible appraisal if one exists. 

House hacking sounds horrible to me.

Anyone who is interested in my methodology or where I got my data (Zillow) feel free to connect with me and I'm happy to share. 1 Memphis, TN 2 Jackson, MS 3 El Paso, TX 4 Winston-Salem, NC 5 Greensboro, NC 6 Scranton, PA 7 Lakeland, FL 8 Tulsa, OK 9 Dayton, OH 10 Chicago, IL   It seems like you’re not considering stats on if the population is growing or shrinking, employment is growing or shrinking, property taxes, and if its landlord friendly or horribly tenant friendly like NY.  

Multiple inconsistencies and horrible comps (out of town appraiser who failed to understand the nuances of location).

Have you ever read a post on one of these forums saying something like, “I would never invest in California/Detroit because it is a horrible place to invest.”