I  It's an animal that has been registered as an Emotional Support Animal (ESA) by a licensed therapist, psychologist, doctor, psychiatrist or any other licensed mental health professional. ...

For me, an emergency is defined as anything that will endanger the health or safety of others, or anything that will endanger the property if not dealt with immediately.

Their health care system is horrible.

Sufficient water is also an important factor when it comes to maintaining their health and vitality.

You have the right and arguably the responsibility to remove this animal and/or the resident from your property.According to HUD: "The FHA does not require a dwelling to be made available to an individual whose tenancywould constitute a direct threat to the health or safety of other individuals or whose tenancywould result in substantial physical damage to the property of others.A housing providermay, therefore, refuse a reasonable accommodation for an assistance animal if the specificanimal poses a direct threat that cannot be eliminated or reduced to an acceptable levelthrough actions the individual takes to maintain or control the animal"You can read the full HUD guidelines here: https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfil...The ESA abuse by tenants is ridiculous. 

For lava zones 1 and 2, the property sold there tends to be quite cheap because of the threat of lava - and extra insurance is quite expensive.  

I was told that any contract signed as an individual poses a threat to your personal assets if your ever sued.

Spent over two dozen years in the small central coast town of Cambria, CA before moving to the dryer desert for health reasons. 

Property owners who refused to allow either the rental or point of sale inspection were subject to fines and possible criminal prosecution.The lawsuit, which was filed on behalf of several property owners by the 1851 Center for Constitutional Law, a non-profit entity, alleged that because the inspections were done under the threat of criminal prosecution, the ordinance violated the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches.

No recent reviews about this company because in the fine print of their terms and conditions there is a veiled threat that they will sue you if you say anything derogatory about the company.