If you guys think that I am missing something please let me know. 

Hey guys, I've got a quick question which has thrown me for a bit of a spin.

I'm a south shore guy.

I understand that the rules would help you determine if the property cash flowed and that the 2% one was used first, while the 50% was used more like a final factor (in the example).What doesn't make sense is why the property was deemed a bad idea, wouldn't the fact that the 50% rule gave 0 cash flow (rather than negative) mean that the investor would still be able to make money on loan pay down?

However, I'm have quite a bit of experience and have my own guys that only work for me so my overall pricing is probably better than yours.

Thanks a lot guys for your time and feedback.

So I can see what kind of money these guys/gals have.

Do you need a guy to file probate, quiet title, foreclosure defense, commercial litigation?

I would suggest that the simple fact they are on ODSP will not make them a bad tenant.  

Hopefully you guys can help me to reach my full potential and also share what I've learned with you.