I recently replaced several of my resource partners after tolerating their "expectation" of my business versus appreciating it. 

Sometimes it's ambiguous, but even then, why should I bother with the company that has numerous unresolved lawsuits, versus another company that is virtually the same but has none.

People that have high cash flow already look more at tax depreciation and equity multiple for total IRR over time versus high cash flow today.

It can become a much much bigger headache to pursue that path versus having some type of arrangement, and if they help you to get another tenant in there - great. 

If you want a gap funder that is loan based versus equity, give me a shout, I know a few. 

I would rather reach my cash flow goal with as few units as possible versus having to manage 1,000 units and 1,000+ tenants. 

Find yourself a broker who works with investors and ask for a market analysis (it won't cost you anything):  what are buyers seeking at what price point and what is the sale cycle time for new construction versus rehab. 

Versus having to go through the permitting process for non-owner occupied?

Always use a closing atty versus Escrow Company!!!

My guess is you are telling all the agents the entire back story versus just being vague.