(or pay all year, whether they live there all year or not) Before I share the case for the RV park that behaves similarly, let's cover the main differences in a traditional sense.MH ParksInherently more stable assets, especially if all the homes are owned by the residentsEasier to manage once the park is stabilizedFilling vacant spaces requires moving homes, setting them up, making renovations, marketing, sales, and potentially carrying notesResidents tend to stay long termCapable of producing extremely stable cash flow, with the ability to perform through a recession RV Parks - A traditional RV park has transient traffic that moves in and out of the park.

If it was 150K with each side producing 1,000 yes but if each side produces 500 then no.

You create a sample deal of what you think a real deal that will produce a good return will look like.

It’s also making improvements to its process that will make cathodes 76 percent cheaper, and produce zero wastewater.

I would imagine that the Claytons and CAVCOs of the world are buying their parts in massive bulk directly from the manufacturers (remember that just one mobile home plant typically produces 8 homes per day).

Is it the income it produces, the purchase price, or just general area of a town?

@Denver Borst if you produce high school transcript maybe lender will waive 2 yrs w2 and tax returns requirement.

Has consistently produced income and been a stable investment in a great area Lessons learned?

I would consider a multi but if not an option I  wouldn't consider the single an Investment until its producing income (option renting a room or two/ possible air bnb).

want to add if this is a 5+ multi family property it was sold based on the income it produces and delivering it vacant is not what "is done" ....