I always model for at least 35%-40% of EGI to be OE.

Even though many leases forbid subletting, we all know if you don't know, you can't object and therefore enforce.Vacation areas are most exposed to this problem and IMO, the facilitators (VBRO, AirBnB, Homeaway) need to be proactive on this front, less this business model just get outlawed.

So the process server I hired to serve the Summons/Complaint/Prejudgment Claim of Right to Possession indicated she tried 2 times last week and 1 time this week and each time she was confronted by an entire family in the SFD being vacated, who somehow moved in and would not give their names but informed that they do not know the named Defendant =LProcess server is mailing the proof of service into court (Los Angeles) but I am now wondering how does that work since per LA and OC websites' wording, that they expect even the Claim of Right to Possession be delivered (whether direct or substituted) to a named defendant?!

My favorite one was determine which business model worked best.

With shared housing, it's a bit different and part of my model is creating the right "mood" in the house.

Have the out of state tenant send you a notorized letter saying THEY moved out and you may have possession .

Buyer will have immediate right of entry and the right of possession for obtaining estimates from general contractors and general informational and inspection purposes.

I want to keep it b/c it's a top of the line Energy Star appliance and one of the few models that fits in the weird little alcove off the kitchen.

Saying it is a bad business model is a cop out.

Dear All,I discovered a great business model last year that's worked very well for me during this short time.